The design internal forces do not change because no load modification has been defined. The torsional stresses are calculated once with Gamma M1 1.0 and once with Gamma M1 according to the National Annex, so that the warning can appear twice. If the filter is increased once more in the following, another x-location (or loading from LC/CO/RC) can also become governing for the warning.
Torsion Warning Message Despite Filter Definition in Stability Analysis
When designing a beam, I would like to neglect the torsion included in the stability analyses using the filters described in Knowledge Base article #001498. I define the filter, but the torsion warning appears at the same x‑location again. Do the design internal forces change, or why is that?

The aim of this technical article is to perform a design according to the general design method of Eurocode 2, using the example of a slender reinforced concrete column.

.png?mw=512&hash=4a84cbc5b1eacf1afb4217e8e43c5cb50ed8d827)


The "Nonlinear Material Behavior" add-on includes the Anistropic | Damage material model for concrete structural components. This material model allows you to consider concrete damage for members, surfaces, and solids.
You can define an individual stress-strain diagram via a table, use the parametric input to generate the stress-strain diagram, or use the predefined parameters from the standards. Furthermore, it is possible to consider the tension stiffening effect.
For the reinforcement, both nonlinear material models "Isotropic | Plastic (Members)" and "Isotropic | Nonlinear Elastic (Members)" are available.
It is possible to consider the long-term effects due to creep and shrinkage using the "Static Analysis | Creep & Shrinkage (Linear)" analysis type that has been recently released. Creep is taken into account by stretching the stress-strain diagram of the concrete using the factor (1+phi), and shrinkage is taken into account as the pre-strain of the concrete. More detailed time step analyses are possible using the "Time-Dependent Analysis (TDA)" add-on.

In the Concrete Design add-on, you can determine the required longitudinal reinforcement for the direct crack width analysis (w k).

For the design of reinforced concrete members, there is the option to automatically determine the number or diameter of rebars.

For concrete design, you can display the reinforcement results in tables separately by design situation.
Why is the effective depth different with the effective depth used in shear checks?
How can I check the determination of the required reinforcement?