Description
In this example, the shear at the interface between concrete cast at different times and the corresponding reinforcement are determined according to DIN EN 1992-1-1. The obtained results with RFEM 6 will be compared to the hand calculation below.
The Model consists of 2.812 m T-beam, fixed in one end. The shear section is shown in the figure below.
Material | Concrete C25/30 | Modulus of Elasticity | E | 31000 | N/mm2 |
Design value of concrete compressive strength | fcd | 14.167 | N/mm2 | ||
Reinforcing steel B500S(A) | Characteristic yield strength | fyk | 500.000 | N/mm2 | |
Design yield strength | fyd | 434.783 | N/mm2 | ||
Geometry | T-beam | Height | h | 1350 | mm |
Effective depth | d | 1280 | mm | ||
Flange height | hf | 290 | mm | ||
Flange width | beff | 2500 | mm | ||
Web width | bw | 400 | mm | ||
Load | Permanant loads | Nodal load | 800.0 | kN |
The T-beam is modelled in RFEM 6 using the member type Rib.
Analytical Solution
The inner forces at the end of the cantilever are summarized in the following table:
Inner Forces | |||
Type | Symbole | Unit | Result |
Design shear force | VEd | [kN] | 800 |
Design bending moment | MEd | [kNm] | 2250 |
The area of tensile reinforcement is calculated using dimension tables:
Next, the design shear stress vEdi and the design shear resistance vRd,c are determined:
vEdi is superior to vRd,c. Therefore, shear reinforcement is required:
RFEM Settings
- In the Rib setting, shear joint between flange and web is activated.
- The roughness classification is set to Indented
Results
Designation | Variable | Unit | RFEM result | Analytical solution | Ratio |
Roughness factor c | c | [-] | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
Roughness factor | μ | [-] | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear for joints | ν | [-] | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
Inner lever arm | z | [m] | 1.179 | 1.152 | 1.02 |
Ratio of longitudinal force in new concrete area and total longitudinal force | β | [-] | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Angle | α | [°] | 90 | 90 | 1.0 |
Design value of shear stress in interface | vEd,i | [N/mm2] | 1.695 | 1.736 | 0.98 |
Maximum design shear resistance at the interface | vRd,i,max | [N/mm2] | 4.958 | 4.958 | 1.0 |
Design shear resistance at the interface without shear reinforcement | vRd,i | [N/mm2] | 0.510 | 0.510 | 1.0 |
Required shear reinforcement at the interface | asw,i,req | [cm2/m] | 10.10 | 10.44 | 0.97 |
Results
The RFEM 6 results obtained are highly accurate. The observed slight deviations primarily stem from the calculation of the inner lever arm, z. In the analytical solution, z is simply considered as 90% of the effective depth, whereas RFEM calculates it precisely.