Question
The calculation of my model results in unrealistically high stresses at many locations. What could be the reason for this?
Answer:
The most common causes are listed below:
Singularities occur in a limited area due to the concentration of stress-dependent result values. They are conditioned by the FEM methodology: In theory, the stiffness and/or the stress in an infinite size will concentrate on an infinitesimally small area. Therefore, singularities occur especially at point supports, load application locations, reentrant corners, or in the area of stiffness peaks.
If the result value of the stress peak is greater and the area of this stress peak is smaller in the case of a finer FE mesh, a singularity is very likely to occur.
The recommendations for dealing with the singularity locations are included in the following technical articles of our Knowledge Base; for example:
Rigid supports (infinitely stiff supports) are rather unrealistic in many cases. Therefore, we recommend displaying the supports as elastic supports. In this case, the stiffness of the adjacent structural components should be estimated realistically.
For checking purposes, the deformation diagram is suitable, possibly with a stronger precamber, as well as the result display of the support reactions or contact stresses. For a better overview, the simplest possible loads should be used for the check.
A mistake in the direction definition, for example, of loads, member hinges, or line and surface releases, is often the cause of unrealistic behavior. When using local or rotated coordinate systems as reference systems, you must pay attention to the correct definition. For example, nonlinearities defined in the opposite direction are typical for supports that fail due to tension or compression.
Incorrectly defined loads can be identified easily by displaying the loading. The loads applied for the calculation can be displayed easily in the Results navigator using the "Load Distribution" option.
Furthermore, modeling inaccuracies can also lead to the incorrect definition of directions. By importing a DXF file, you can introduce inaccuracies into the model; for example, nodes that are not on top of each other or lines skewed in the wrong directions.
The "Regenerate Model" feature is very helpful for treating minor inaccuracies.
Incorrectly defined releases and hinges can usually be identified by means of the deformation image and the diagrams of internal forces. Again, we recommend working with simple loads for checking purposes.
It can often happen that not all external or internal influences from a structure to be modeled have been considered sufficiently and accurately in the model. Supports or supporting structural components may not have been modeled, or they are in the wrong place. The realistic estimation of the stiffness of the adjacent structural components is also important. Provided that it has been over- or underestimated, the load transfer in the model is sometimes changed significantly.
However, it is possible to simply check the deformation, possibly by using a stronger precamber.
The following questions may help you to find the solution if the real structure is known: Is the magnitude of the deformations close to reality? Is the deformation diagram qualitatively consistent with my expectations?
A good example is presented in the following Knowledge Base article:
Do you have any questions?
![KB 001883 | Plate Girder Design According to AISC 360-22 in RFEM 6](/en/webimage/051561/3980997/im1.png?mw=512&hash=b8237709c4f30213fac51d86d32a42bddde72f03)
Plate girder is an economical choice for long spans construction. I-section steel plate girder typically has a deep web to maximize its shear capacity and flange separation, yet thin web to minimize the self-weight. Due to its large height-to-thickness (h/tw) ratio, transverse stiffeners may be required to stiffen the slender web.
![Steel Connection Rigidity and Its Influence on Structural Design](/en/webimage/051432/3972404/Rigidity-caseA.png?mw=512&hash=3be64e68ab2956fd2b92f0afa1559b3a8c72b468)
Understanding steel connection rigidity is crucial in structural design. Often, connections are treated as strictly pinned or rigid, but this can lead to uneconomical or even dangerous designs. Explore how Dlubal Software's RFEM and Steel Joints add-on help verify connection stiffness and moment resistance, ensuring safer and more economical designs.
![Timber Panel Wall Stiffnesses](/en/webimage/049956/3893282/49956.png?mw=512&hash=8dfc2b6d0af6ade74073e21655c6a73a34a77751)
In this article, the calculation of a timber panel wall with the beam panel thickness type is compared with a manual calculation.
![KB 001848 | Timber Column Design as per the 2018 NDS Standard in RFEM 6](/en/webimage/040983/3525158/Timber_Column_for_KB_1848.png?mw=512&hash=8767c3300658d77c253bb7ff632327937a04dd95)
Using the Timber Design add-on, timber column design is possible according to the 2018 NDS standard ASD method. Accurately calculating timber member compressive capacity and adjustment factors is important for safety considerations and design. The following article will verify the maximum critical buckling strength calculated by the Timber Design add-on using step-by-step analytical equations as per the NDS 2018 standard including the compressive adjustment factors, adjusted compressive design value, and final design ratio.
![Add-on "Steel Joints for RFEM 6" | Component Library](/en/webimage/043097/3898884/steel_joints_components.png?mw=512&hash=e4f835906155863fc7019d5043b22e553dc766f9)
- Numerous component types, such as base and end plates, web angles, fin plates, gusset plates, stiffeners, tapers, or ribs for easy input of typical connection situations
- Universally applicable basic components (such as plates, welds, bolts, auxiliary planes) for modeling complex connection situations
- Graphical display of the connection geometry with dynamic updating during the input
- Wide range of cross-section shapes: I-sections, U-sections, angles, T-sections, hollow sections, built-up cross-sections and thin-walled sections
- Library in the Dlubal Center with a large number of program-side template connections, including user-defined templates
- Automatic adaptation of the connection geometry based on the relative arrangement of the components to each other – even in case of subsequent editing of the structural components
![Feature 002828 | Fire Design of Slabs and Walls According to Simplified Table Method](/en/webimage/050837/3925042/50837.png?mw=512&hash=b06639a36ab8b62ab6d08e08552a5ec274469a37)
In the Concrete Design add-on for RFEM 6, you can perform the fire design of reinforced concrete slabs and walls according to the simplified table method (EN 1992‑1‑2, Section 5.4.2 and Tables 5.8 and 5.9).
![Feature 002826 | Punching Shear Reinforcement](/en/webimage/050658/3936123/50658.png?mw=512&hash=ae20d4ca78cdf203a2c2d3ccbb7daa0f324da77a)
In the Concrete Design add-on, you have the option to define an existing vertically oriented punching shear reinforcement. This is then taken into account in the punching shear design.
![Feature 002824 | OSB Material for USA and Canada](/en/webimage/050460/3955503/2024-06-28_10-42-39.png?mw=512&hash=5ec86ff7955d8c9a50e53301df3f21fceda009a5)
In RFEM, the oriented strand board (OSB) material is available for the USA and Canada. The material parameters are taken from the "Panel Design Specification manual".
Recommended Products for You