219x

2020-06-27

VE 0017 | Пластический изгиб - непрерывная нагрузка

Описание работы

На левом конце Small deformations are considered and the self-weight is neglected in this example. The problem is described by the following set of parameters. Determine the maximum deflection u_z,max.

Material	Elastic-Plastic	Мод. упруг.	E	210000.000	MPa
		поперечная деформация	ν	0.000	-
		Модуль сдвига	G	105000.000	MPa
		предел текучести	f_y	40.000	MPa
Geometry	Plate	Длительность	L	1.000	m
		Ширина	w	0.050	m
		толщина	t	0.005	m
Load		Uniform Pressure	p	2.750	kPa

Пластический изгиб - непрерывная нагрузка

Analytical Solution

The quantities of the load are discussed at first. The moment M_e when the first yield is occurred and the ultimate moment M_p when the structure becomes plastic hinge are calculated as follows:

M_{e} = 2 \int_{0}^{t / 2} σ (z) zw dz = 2 \int_{0}^{t / 2} \frac{2 f_{y}}{t} z^{2} w dz = \frac{f_{y} {wt}^{2}}{6}

Упругий момент

M_{p} = 2 \int_{0}^{t / 2} σ (z) zw dz = 2 \int_{0}^{t / 2} f_{y} zw dz = \frac{f_{y} {wt}^{2}}{4}

предельный пластический момент

The plate is brought into the elastic-plastic state by the pressure p. The bending stress is defined according to the following formula:

σ_{x} (x, z) = - κ (x) Ez

Изгибающее напряжение

where κ is the curvature. The elastic-plastic zone length is described by the parameter x_p. The bending stress quantity on the surface is equal to the plastic strength f_y at the point x_p, see the following schema.

Распределение изгибающих напряжений

The elastic-plastic moment M_ep (internal force) has to equal to the bending moment M (external force). The curvature κ_p in the elastic-plastic zone results from this equality.

κ_{p} = \frac{1}{E} \sqrt{\frac{\frac{f_{y}^{3} w}{3}}{- \frac{q (L - x)^{2}}{2} + \frac{f_{y} t^{2} w}{4}}}

Кривизна в упруго-пластической зоне

u_{z, \max} = \int_{0}^{x_{p}} κ_{p} (L - x) dx + \int_{x_{p}}^{L} κ_{e} (L - x) dx = 83.117 + 83.117 = 166.234 mm

Максимальный прогиб консоли

RFEM Settings

Modeled in RFEM 5.26 and RFEM 6.01
The element size is l_FE=0.020 m
In case of solid models mesh refinement across the thickness is used (6 elements per thickness)
Geometrically linear analysis is considered
The number of increments is 5
Shear stiffness of the members is neglected

Результаты

Model	Analytical Solution	RFEM 5		Rfem 6
Model	u_z,max [mm]	u_z,max [mm]	Ratio [-]	u_z,max [mm]	Ratio [-]
Изотропная пластичная 1D	166.234	166.214	1.000	166.018	0.999
Isotropic Plastic 2D/3D, Plate		162.987	0.980	162.960	0.980
Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 2D/3D, Plate, von Mises		165.730	0.997	165.700	0.997
Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 2D/3D, Plate, Tresca		166.998	1.005	166.969	1.004
Isotropic Plastic 2D/3D, Solid		160.601	0.966	162.429	0.977
Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 2D/3D, Solid, von Mises		163.003	0.981	165.593	0.996
Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 2D/3D, Solid, Tresca		168.725	1.015	169.691	1.021
Изотропная нелинейная упругая 1D		166.214	1.000	166.018	0.999

Примечание: The results deviation is also caused by the difference between the analytical and numerically calculated torsional constant.

427x

Контрольный пример 0017 | 1

Ссылки

Люблинер, J .: (1990). Теория пластичности. Нью-Йорк: MacMillen, 2015

;